Well, Well, Well!!!Check This Out!!!!

[mjboogie]

What about the administrators of the estate could they be the ones to revoke the will? Branca and McClain? I am not a legal person so pardon me. Ummmmmm guys? Who the bleep is Billie Jean Jackson? And Prince Malachi Jet? Also why is the list soooooo long? January is going to be a lot of things going on regarding MJ! This is getting really scary! I just feel like something is going to happen I dont' know if it is good or bad. You know how you can feel a tornado coming? ( sounding like a freight train getting closer and closer!) That is what all of this feels like since June!

[Serenitys_Dream]

What about the administrators of the estate could they be the ones to revoke the will? Branca and McClain? I am not a legal person so pardon me. Ummmmmm guys? Who the bleep is Billie Jean Jackson? And Prince Malachi Jet? Also why is the list soooooo long? January is going to be a lot of things going on regarding MJ! This is getting really scary! I just feel like something is going to happen I dont' know if it is good or bad. You know how you can feel a tornado coming? ( sounding like a freight train getting closer and closer!) That is what all of this feels like since June!

Revocation of a Will

A will is ambulatory, which means that a competent testator may change or revoke it at any time before his death. Revocation of a will occurs when a person who has made a will takes some action to indicate that he no longer wants its provisions to be binding and the law abides by his decision.

For revocation to be effective, the intent of the testator, whether express or implied, must be clear, and an act of revocation consistent with this intent must occur. Persons who wish to revoke a will may use a codicil, which is a document that changes, revokes, or amends part or all of a validly executed will. When a person executes a codicil that revokes some provisions of a previous will, the courts will recognize this as a valid revocation. Likewise, a new will that completely revokes an earlier will indicates the testator's intent to revoke the will.

Statements made by a person at or near the time that he intentionally destroys his will by burning, mutilating, or tearing it clearly demonstrate his intent to revoke.

Sometimes revocation occurs by operation of law, as in the case of a marriage, Divorce, birth of a child, or the sale of property devised in the will, which automatically changes the legal duties of the testator. Many states provide that when a testator and spouse have been divorced but the testator's will has not been revised since the change in marital status, any disposition to the former spouse is revoked.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Revocation+of+a+Will

An anonymous poster on the LA Hoax chat posted this:
"did anyone notice that the confidential document was filed by a claimant. Not a petitioner. So whatever led to revocation of will was filed by one of the claimants. joe is listed as petitioner and oxman as attorney for petitioner"
http://wwwmjhoaxliveblogspo.chatango.com/

Nothing I have found on the revocation (revoking) a Will says anything about anyone but the testator (the creator of the Will) revoking it. We also have confidential documents being filed by a claimant and not a petitioner which is very intriguing. We have no way to know at this point what these documents are or who filed them. January may be an interesting month indeed.

[ILuvUMoreMJ]

I just found out that the Ranjack Group listed is Randy Jackson's company...so he's suing MJ's estate too. I don't know what to think about that.

[Datroot]

Who on earth is Billie Jean Jackson?

[Serenitys_Dream]

Who on earth is Billie Jean Jackson?

Billie Jean Jackson Michael Jackson Lawsuit
December 22nd, 2008 by Castina

According to court documents filed in Los Angeles last Friday, Billie Jean Jackson, whose real name is believed to be Lavon Powlis, claims she’s married to Michael Jackson and is seeking joint custody of the pop legend’s youngest child, 6-year-old Blanket.
Billie Jean claims she is Blanket’ birth mother.
Billie Jean, 60, is suing the singer for $1 billion dollars “in support of Blanket.” According to the Associated Press, in 1987, the same woman filed a $150 million paternity lawsuit against the singer.
Back then she claimed Michael had fathered three of her children and would not pay child support.
In March of 2008, she was arrested by Santa Barbara County sheriff’s deputies for trespassing on Michael’s Neverland Ranch in the Santa Ynez Valley.
http://www.popcrunch.com/billie-jean-jackson-michael-jackson-lawsuit/

[angelshadow]

O my God
These people are bad in it.... Cracked.....

[kdkennedy74]

"Confidential documents being filed by a claimant" I am highlighting all of the "Claimants" below. I wonder who this is going to be?!?


A4V DIGITAL INC. - Claimant

ABRAMS MICHAEL L. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

ADU NONA - AKA

AEG LIVE LLC - Petitioner

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP - Claimant

ATKINS GRAHAM - Claimant

ATKINS THOMSON SOLICITORS - Claimant

AYSCOUGH & MARAR - Claimant

BENNETT ROBERT E. ATTORNEY AT LAW - Attorney for Claimant

BONDER TODD W. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

BONE WILLIAM - Claimant

BRANCA JOHN - Petitioner

BRAVADO INTL GROUP MERCHANDISING SVC INC - Petitioner

BUA JOSEPH D. SR. - Probate Referee

BUIE CHARLENE - Objector

CANNON & COMPANY CPAS LLP - Claimant

CHARNLEY RICHARD L. - Attorney for Claimant

COHEN JERYLL S. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

DANIELSON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY - Surety Company

FEINSWOG KENNETH A. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

FELDMAN MILES J. - Attorney for Claimant

GRIM LERUE - Attorney for Petitioner

HANSELL DEAN ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

HARRIS-SCOTT HELEN M. - Claimant

HOFFMAN PAUL GORDON ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

HORNBERGER NICHOLAS W. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant

IGLESIAS ANER - Claimant

IN PRO PER - Attorney for Petitioner

JACKSON BILLIE JEAN - Petitioner

JACKSON JOSEPH WALTER - Petitioner

JACKSON KATHERINE ESTHER - Petitioner

JACKSON MICHAEL - AKA

JACKSON MICHAEL JOSEPH - Subject Person

JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Claimant

JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Petitioner

JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET - Claimant

JOHNSON DANIEL ALBERT - Attorney for Claimant

JORRIE KATHY A. - Attorney for Petitioner

KLEIN ARNOLD W. M.D. - Claimant

LAINER SIDNEY ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

LANDIS JOHN - Claimant

LAPOINTE RICHARD - Claimant

LEVITCH BURT ATTORNEY AT LAW - Former Attorney for Pltf/Petn

LEVITSKY PRODUCTIONS INC. - Claimant

LODISE MARGARET G. ESQ. - PVP Attorney

MALINGAGIO PAUL S. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant

MAYER & M&J INC. DBA VIDEO & AUDIO CNTR - Claimant

MCCLAIN JOHN - Petitioner

MILLER-GINSBURG CATHY S. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant

MILLET PATRICIA A. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner

NEWT RONNIE L. - Petitioner

OXMAN BRIAN - Attorney for Petitioner

PARRISH LYNDA L. - Claimant

RANJACK GROUP INC. - Claimant

RAY OLA - Claimant

REIMANN NANCY B. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant

RONAY PETER E. LAW OFFICE OF - Attorney for Petitioner

SCHREIBER JOHN E. - Attorney for Petitioner

SEGAL LAWRENCE ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant

SHERIDAN LYNDA - Claimant

SMITH LAVELLE JR. - Claimant

STABLER & ASSOCIATES INC. - Claimant

STINKYFILMS INC. - Claimant

STREISAND ADAM F. LAW OFFICES OF - Attorney for Petitioner

SUPERIOR COURT - Court

TOHME TOHME R. DR. - Claimant

WANDER PERRY C. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant

WEITZMAN HOWARD ESQ - Attorney for Petitioner

WOLF KENNETH S. ATTORNEY AT LAW - Attorney for Petitioner

YU SUSAN C. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[mumof3]

my god so many weird people no wonder Michael needed a break

[ILuvUMoreMJ]

I thought Randy might be the only brother actually helping MJ with this hoax, but if he's suing the estate then that's not very likely.

[becca26]

I thought Randy might be the only brother actually helping MJ with this hoax, but if he's suing the estate then that's not very likely.

It's a bit off??? He isant doing the show with the brother's either is he?

[Serenitys_Dream]

Here is some eye opening information on Michael's will please watch all 3 videos.

[jill]

I just found out that the Ranjack Group listed is Randy Jackson's company...so he's suing MJ's estate too. I don't know what to think about that.

That's interesting since Jermaine keeps reiterating "It's not about the money" and constantly denying there was no jealousy of MJ by any of the family members. I guess Randy is 'speaking for himself.'

[ILuvUMoreMJ]

Yea, I guess he is. So does this mean that Randy doesn't know about the hoax, or that there isn't one?

[EarthAngel90]

Revocation of his last will ?! ... I feel a return that is going to be sweet ....!

[ClineMJJ]

Hum... I didn't follow this topic and when i read it, I don't understand everything... I have a question ! Can anybody explain me the bond between MJ's will and the 18th January ? I didn't understand it so forgive me Thank you

[lisap27]

I thought Randy might be the only brother actually helping MJ with this hoax, but if he's suing the estate then that's not very likely.

yeh i agree with you on this.. pffftt

[DancingTheDream]

Bejeesus.. thats a long list of lawyers there!

Malachi Jet Jackson is the apparent secret son... i hope he gets a DNA test.

Jan 28th.. interesting date. TII DVD comes out Jan 26th.

Jan 25th will be SEVENTH months anniversary.

[DontBelieveTheHype]

Bejeesus.. thats a long list of lawyers there!

Malachi Jet Jackson is the apparent secret son... i hope he gets a DNA test.

Jan 28th.. interesting date. TII DVD comes out Jan 26th.

Jan 25th will be SEVENTH months anniversary.

So much stuff going on... secret sons and interesting dates and a revokation of will.

About Randy, who knows what he is up to. He hasnt made a single statement regarding Michaels death and not even the Jackson 4 knows about his whereabouts. I think either Randy is a key witness in this hoax or he knows absolutely nothing which would explain his absence.

[Gone too soon]

Well, thanks for all the info! This is beginning to make perfect sense.

It is Randy. Wait and see.
I knew two brothers were involved, one working "on stage", one behind the curtain.
And whatever is behind curtain is nothing we can see, because this was "the last curtain call".

Anyway, what a fantastic job you guys are doing!

[Truth_Freedom]

Yeah, these are all people who were left out of teh will who claim they either had MJ's kids or were his secret lovers or wives. The delusional folks are out for blood. And Papa Joe wants changes too.

[voiceforthesilent]

ellbell290 - I found the same thing very interesting? What does Michael's name being on there mean? I also wondered why AEG is listed as a plaintiff? Are they suing Michael's estate too? They have made their money back and then some, right? I think we are missing important details by getting caught up in the "ex-wives club".

[hesouttamylife]

1/28/2010 is just around the corner; however you have to be ALIVE to revoke a will. How do they intend to explain this, if indeed it does happen? Hmmmmmmm
http://www.wills-online.com/willsguide/change.asp

[hesouttamylife]

BTW, 1/28/2010 is the 25th anniversary of the making of We Are The World

[Inhalib]

Nothing happens on Jan 28, at least nothing about the will.
Did anybody hear a new date for this will to be revoked? I haven't heard a thing after this was mentioned O.o

Lots of L.O.V.E!

[voiceforthesilent]

Nothing happens on Jan 28, at least nothing about the will.
Did anybody hear a new date for this will to be revoked? I haven't heard a thing after this was mentioned O.o

Lots of L.O.V.E!

All's been quiet on the homefront...at least nothing fromTMZ